Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP Taylor Bachrach is celebrating the passage of new anti-scab legislation, a milestone for which he says organized labour and his NDP party have spent years advocating.

鈥淭his is a historic win for working people,鈥� said Bachrach. 鈥淭he use of scabs has long undermined workers鈥� right to collectively bargain, which is key to securing better pay and conditions.鈥�

Bill C-58, aimed at prohibiting the use of replacement workers during strikes in federally regulated workplaces, passed the House of Commons with unanimous support on May 27. The legislation, a key element of the supply-and-confidence agreement between the Liberals and the NDP, received 317 votes in favour and none opposed.

Bachrach noted that the NDP has introduced nine anti-scab bills over the past 15 years.

鈥淔or almost two decades, the Liberals and Conservatives have voted against better worker protections. Pierre Poilievre has voted against anti-scab bills eight times while simultaneously giving corporations billions in handouts,鈥� Bachrach said. 鈥淎t a time of record corporate profits, this law ensures working people have a fair chance at the negotiating table 鈥� a fair chance to negotiate what they deserve.鈥�

READ MORE:

Canada鈥檚 largest union in the federally regulated private sector, UNIFOR, with locals across the Northwest, has long supported the bill. The union argues the case for the legislation is clear, as replacement workers undermine the right to strike by reducing the impact of labour withdrawal and business disruption.

鈥淲hile employers argue that scabs are needed to 鈥榢eep the lights on,鈥� they conveniently overlook the fact that no ban on replacement workers has ever been implemented without a clause mandating the maintenance of essential services,鈥� a union statement reads.

鈥淭he real reason employers deploy scabs is simple: to break the power of the union and keep business going as usual.鈥�