Canada鈥檚 polar bear protection is getting good marks from an international conservation group, but the World Wildlife Fund says the country could better protect important habitat and minimize threats to the iconic predators.

鈥淭hey largely did a pretty good job of accomplishing what they needed to,鈥� said Brandon Laforest, who helped develop the scorecard.

鈥淭hey did not do a good job of bringing it up to the next level.鈥�

And one of the country鈥檚 leading polar bear experts said Canada needs to do much better than the rating suggests.

鈥淚 think they鈥檙e being very kind,鈥� said Andrew Derocher of the University of Alberta.

The group issued the scorecard for all five nations with bear populations. They were graded on how well they鈥檝e fulfilled promises made two years ago as part of a 10-year plan to protect polar bears.

Canada 鈥� home to two-thirds of the world鈥檚 roughly 25,000 bears 鈥� is in the middle of the pack, behind Norway but well ahead of Russia.

Canada is praised for communicating the threat of climate change, monitoring populations, managing hunts and trade and incorporating Inuit knowledge.

鈥淲e commend them for their commitment,鈥� Laforest said. 鈥淐anada is leading the way.鈥�

But there are problems. Canada couldn鈥檛 deal with an environmental emergency that could affect the bears, such as an oil or fuel spill from ships.

READ MORE:

READ MORE:

Not enough is known about the High Arctic habitat where the bears are likely to follow the steady retreat of sea ice.

And Laforest said while Canada does a better job than most countries at surveying populations, it isn鈥檛 enough in a rapidly changing Arctic.

鈥淲hen you have decade-old estimates of populations and you鈥檙e trying to manage them actively in an actively changing environment, we feel even though Canada allots $1.5 million annually for those surveys, there needs to be a re-evaluation.鈥�

Derocher agreed much of the population information Canada relies on is woefully dated.

鈥淥ur inventory frequency, while we have moved to improve that, is still grossly inadequate,鈥� he said. 鈥淚t might be adequate for harvest management, but in a changing climate it probably is not.

鈥淲e鈥檝e got many populations that are coming on 20 years without re-inventory.鈥�

For one population suspected to be in decline, survey results have yet to be released although the fieldwork was completed four years ago.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a capacity issue 鈥� huge areas, lots of demands,鈥� Derocher said.

Three of Canada鈥檚 13 populations are known to be declining. Bears along the west coast of Hudson Bay are down anywhere from 11 to 30 per cent, while those along the Beaufort Sea coast have lost up to half their numbers.

鈥淭here was a new aerial survey just done. My understanding was they found so few bears, they may not be able to get an estimate.鈥�

Rapid change in the Arctic means that today鈥檚 critical bear habitat is likely to be less so in the future, said Derocher. He said Canada needs to conduct more research in the High Arctic, the so-called Last Ice Area.

鈥淭he critical habitat that we want to understand and protect long-term would be those areas in the high latitudes of the Canadian archipelago. And yet, there鈥檚 been virtually no work in this area.

鈥淒o we see a movement to set up long-term monitoring to understand that ecosystem? I don鈥檛 see a lot of evidence.鈥�

Bob Weber, The Canadian Press

Like us on and follow us on .