亚洲天堂

Skip to content

Trump fumes over NYT op-ed; top officials swiftly deny role

White House officials did not immediately elaborate on Trump鈥檚 call for the writer to be turned over
13450167_web1_13438343-b47e0d4e6feb475cb6ee7ef1df910648
President Donald Trump responds to a reporters question during an event with sheriffs in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2018. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Pushing back against explosive reports his own administration is conspiring against him, President Donald Trump lashed out against the anonymous senior official who wrote a New York Times opinion piece claiming to be part of a 鈥渞esistance鈥 working 鈥渇rom within鈥 to thwart his most dangerous impulses.

Perhaps as striking as the essay was the recognition of the long list of administration officials who plausibly could have been its author. Many have privately shared some of the same concerns expressed about the president with colleagues, friends and reporters.

Washington was consumed by a wild guessing game as to the identity of the writer, and swift denials of involvement in the op-ed came Thursday from top administration officials, including from Vice-President Mike Pence鈥檚 office, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Dan Coats, director of national intelligence, and other Cabinet members.

Trump was furious, tweeting Thursday morning that 鈥淭he Deep State and the Left, and their vehicle, the Fake 亚洲天堂 Media, are going Crazy - & they don鈥檛 know what to do.鈥

On Wednesday night, Trump tweeted a demand that if 鈥渢he GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!鈥 White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called on the 鈥渃oward鈥 who wrote the piece to 鈥渄o the right thing and resign.鈥

White House officials did not immediately respond to a request to elaborate on Trump鈥檚 call for the writer to be turned over to the government or the unsupported national security ground of his demand.

To some observers, the ultimatum appeared to play into the very concerns about the president鈥檚 impulses raised by the essay鈥檚 author. Trump has demanded that aides identify the leaker, according to two people familiar with the matter, though it was unclear how they might go about doing so. The two were not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

In a 鈥淗ouse of Cards鈥-style plot twist in an already over-the-top administration, Trump allies and political insiders scrambled to unmask the writer. But the op-ed also brought to light questions that have been whispered in Washington for more than a year: Is Trump truly in charge? And could a divided executive branch pose a danger to the country?

Former CIA Director John Brennan, a fierce Trump critic, called the op-ed 鈥渁ctive insubordination 鈥 born out of loyalty to the country.鈥

鈥淭his is not sustainable to have an executive branch where individuals are not following the orders of the chief executive,鈥 Brennan told NBC鈥檚 鈥淭oday鈥 show. 鈥淚 do think things will get worse before they get better. I don鈥檛 know how Donald Trump is going to react to this. A wounded lion is a very dangerous animal, and I think Donald Trump is wounded.鈥

The anonymous author, claiming to be part of the 鈥渞esistance鈥 to Trump 鈥渨orking diligently from within鈥 his administration, said, 鈥淢any Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump鈥檚 more misguided impulses until he is out of office.鈥

鈥淚t may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room,鈥 the author continued. 鈥淲e fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what鈥檚 right even when Donald Trump won鈥檛.鈥

Trump raged about the piece in the White House, calling around to confidants to vent about the disloyalty of the author and fuming that the so-called Deep State within the federal government had conspired against him, according to a person familiar with the president鈥檚 views but not authorized to discuss them publicly.

First lady Melania Trump also weighed in, praising the free press as 鈥渋mportant to our democracy鈥 before attacking the writer, saying 鈥測ou are not protecting this country, you are sabotaging it with your cowardly actions.鈥

The text of the op-ed was pulled apart for clues: The writer is identified as an 鈥渁dministration official鈥; does that mean a person who works outside the White House? The references to Russia and the late Sen. John McCain 鈥 do they suggest someone working in national security? Does the writing style sound like someone who worked at a think-tank ? In a tweet, the Times used the pronoun 鈥渉e鈥 to refer to the writer; does that rule out all women?

The newspaper later said the tweet referring to 鈥渉e鈥 had been 鈥渄rafted by someone who is not aware of the author鈥檚 identity, including the gender, so the use of 鈥榟e鈥 was an error.鈥

The Beltway guessing game seeped into the White House, as current and former staffers alike traded calls and texts trying to figure out who could have written the piece, some turning to reporters and asking them for clues. For many in Trump鈥檚 orbit, it was stunning to realize just how many people could have been the op-ed鈥檚 author. And some of the most senior members of the Trump administration were forced to deny they were the author of the attack on their boss.

Hotly debated on Twitter was the author鈥檚 use of the word 鈥渓odestar,鈥 which pops up frequently in speeches by Pence. Could the anonymous figure be someone in Pence鈥檚 orbit? Others argued that the word 鈥渓odestar鈥 could have been included to throw people off.

In a rare step, Pence鈥檚 communications director Jarrod Agen tweeted early Thursday that 鈥淭he Vice-President puts his name on his Op-Eds. The @nytimes should be ashamed and so should the person who wrote the false, illogical, and gutless op-ed. Our office is above such amateur acts.鈥

Pompeo, who was in India, denied writing the anonymous opinion piece, saying, 鈥淚t鈥檚 not mine.鈥 He accused the media of trying to undermine the Trump administration and said he found that 鈥渋ncredibly disturbing.鈥

Coats later issued his own denial, followed by Defence Secretary James Mattis, Housing Secretary Ben Carson, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, budget director Mick Mulvaney and others; and with several prominent administration members delivering on-the-record denials, the focus could now fall on other senior aides to do the same, with questions raised about those who stay silent.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders tried to head off reporters鈥 inquiries of Trump officials, tweeting that the questions should be aimed at The New York Times, which she said was 鈥渃omplicit in this deceitful act.鈥 Trump, appearing at an unrelated event Wednesday at the White House, lashed out at the Times for publishing the op-ed.

鈥淭hey don鈥檛 like Donald Trump and I don鈥檛 like them,鈥 he said of the newspaper. The op-ed pages of the newspaper are managed separately from its news department.

Early Thursday, Trump followed up with a tweet that touted his administration鈥檚 accomplishments. His other morning tweets 鈥 one on North Korea, the other on the economy 鈥 seemed to be an effort to change the subject.

The anonymous author wrote in the Times that where Trump has had successes, they have come 鈥渄espite 鈥 not because of 鈥 the president鈥檚 leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.鈥

The assertions in the column were largely in line with complaints about Trump鈥檚 behaviour that have repeatedly been raised by various administration officials, often speaking on the condition of anonymity. And they were published a day after the release of details from an explosive new book by longtime journalist Bob Woodward that laid bare concerns among the highest echelon of Trump aides about the president鈥檚 judgment.

The writer of the Times op-ed said Trump aides are aware of the president鈥檚 faults and 鈥渕any of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. I would know. I am one of them.鈥

The writer also alleged 鈥渢here were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment鈥 because of the 鈥渋nstability鈥 witnessed in the president.

The 25th Amendment allows the vice-president to take over if the commander in chief is 鈥渦nable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.鈥 It requires that the vice-president and a majority of the Cabinet back relieving the president.

Zeke Miller, Catherine Lucey And Jonathan Lemire, The Associated Press

Like us on and follow us on .





(or

亚洲天堂

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }