A man convicted of attempted murder who was invited to a dinner reception with Justin Trudeau in India says he had a friendly relationship with the prime minister, and stayed away to save him from further embarrassment.
But the Prime Minister鈥檚 Office says there is no merit to the assertions by Jaspal Atwal, who was convicted of attempted murder in the 1980s. It says he and Trudeau are not friends.
Atwal was interviewed on Saturday by the The Canadian Press at his home in Surrey, B.C., following Trudeau鈥檚, at times, turbulent trip to India. Late on Sunday night, Atwal said he is not suggesting he and the prime minister are friends, but he has known Trudeau for years.
Atwal says he received an invitation directly from the Canadian high commissioner鈥檚 office for the event in New Delhi last week.
British Columbia Liberal MP Randeep Sarai has said in a statement it was his choice alone to include Atwal on the guest list and he realized afterwards that he exercised poor judgement in doing so.
Related:
On Sunday, a senior government official said, on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation, that the high commission invited some guests after receiving recommendations from others, including MPs such as Sarai.
In explaining his relationship with the prime minister, Atwal said the pair sat together in his Hummer and chatted during one of Trudeau鈥檚 visits to B.C. in 2008 or 2009.
鈥淲e know each other. He knows my name, he鈥檒l come and say, 鈥楬ey Jas, how you doing?鈥� We have a good relationship I never see any problem,鈥� he said in the interview on Saturday. 鈥淏ut now he says, 鈥極h Jaspal鈥檚 not supposed to be here, this and that.鈥� It surprised me.鈥�
Related:
Trudeau鈥檚 spokesman, Cameron Ahmad, said the prime minister and Atwal are not friends.
鈥淭hat is not true,鈥� Ahmad said in an interview. Asked about the Humvee conversation, Ahmad said: 鈥淚 don鈥檛 know what he鈥檚 referring to there, but no, they are not (friends).鈥�
Atwal said he is not a member of the Liberal party and has helped politicians from different parties both federally and provincially.
He said he was travelling in India last week on a personal trip and questioned why Sarai is taking the blame alone for his invitation to the reception.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 know why he鈥檚 taking all the responsibility; he had nothing to do with that,鈥� he said. 鈥淭he high commissioner, they鈥檙e the one giving the invitation. Everyone鈥檚 name goes through CSIS and the RCMP.鈥�
But Ahmad disputed Atwal鈥檚 version of events, reiterating the statement that Sarai released last week.
鈥淚 would refer to what the prime minister said when he addressed these matters in India on two occasions,鈥� said Ahmad.
鈥淚t is not true, these claims that come from Mr. Atwal.鈥�
Atwal was convicted of attempting to kill Indian cabinet minister Malkiat Singh Sidhu during a visit to Vancouver Island in 1986.
In spite of media reports, he said he was not a member of the International Sikh Youth Federation, a banned terrorist group in Canada and India, at the time.
He was also charged, but not convicted, in connection with a 1985 attack on Ujjal Dosanjh, a staunch opponent of the Sikh separatist movement, who later became B.C. premier and a federal Liberal cabinet minister.
Atwal said he does not support Khalistani organizations and warns Sikh youth in B.C. against believing propaganda from separatists, many of whom he believes have a financial interest in the cause.
He confirmed he was blacklisted from visiting India because of his crime. But he said any suggestion the government of India intervened 鈥� either by getting him an invitation or removing him from the blacklist so that he could attend 鈥� is a 鈥渢otal lie.鈥�
鈥淚ndia鈥檚 government has nothing to do with anything,鈥� Atwal said.
Ahmad said the Prime Minister鈥檚 Office has no comment on Indian policies regarding visas or blacklists.
Atwal鈥檚 passport shows stamps from two other recent visits to the country in January and August 2017. He said he also visited in 1999 to spread his father鈥檚 ashes and in 2002 to go shopping for his son鈥檚 wedding.
He showed his passport and the invitations from the high commission to the events in India to The Canadian Press.
After his visa expired in 2007, Atwal said he applied to have it renewed but was unsuccessful until his 2017 visits.
A government official, discussing the matter on condition of anonymity, has said guest lists for receptions such as those in India are not vetted individually for security. Those who issue the invites are expected to do their own due diligence to ensure their own guests are safe, the official said.
The official also suggested Atwal鈥檚 presence was engineered by elements within the Indian government to distance the country from Ottawa, driven by concerns that Canada is not fully committed to a united India.
The suggestion has been made that Atwal鈥檚 presence was arranged by factions within the Indian government who refuse to believe there is no risk posed to a united India by Sikh separatists living abroad, said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The factions wanted to undermine the Canadian tour to India to prevent the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi from getting too cozy to foreign governments they believe want to undermine a united India, he said.
The official spoke by phone to reporters travelling with Trudeau during a briefing arranged by the Prime Minister鈥檚 Office. He said Canadian security officials received a tip from intelligence sources within Canada on Wednesday morning that Atwal had been at a reception in Mumbai with the prime minister Tuesday evening.
The official also said Atwal has, since his conviction, been on a list of people banned by India from getting a visa to visit the country because of their ties to Sikh separatist and extremist groups but that he was suddenly removed from that blacklist last summer 鈥� long before Trudeau鈥檚 trip was planned.
Atwal said his invitation to the Canadian high commissioner鈥檚 dinner in New Delhi was not rescinded. He said he volunteered not to attend because he thought it might embarrass the prime minister after photos of him with Sophie Gregoire Trudeau at the event in Mumbai garnered negative media attention.
He said he told a Liberal party official: 鈥淚 don鈥檛 want to see our prime minister embarrassed. I will not come to Delhi, so please take me off the list. This is what I told them.鈥�
But Ahmad made it clear that Atwal was taken off the guest list as soon as the PMO became aware of the controversy.
鈥淚t is a fact that the invitation was rescinded by the high commission,鈥� said Ahmad.
鈥淚鈥檓 not sure he鈥檚 able to send you proof it wasn鈥檛 rescinded.鈥�
Related:
Conservative public safety critic Pierre Paul-Hus said Friday the House of Commons committee on national security should review the Privy Council Office鈥檚 screening practices following Atwal鈥檚 attendance at the reception in Mumbai.
Atwal said the international media attention is 鈥渇rustrating鈥� after he served his time.
鈥淵es, I made a big mistake in my life and I鈥檝e taken full responsibility. But after that, I change, and people here 鈥� blaming and all that, looking at your personal life and all that 鈥� I鈥檓 telling them, grow up. Everybody makes mistakes.鈥�
Last week, a former senior Conservative government official dismissed the theory that Atwal鈥檚 presence was orchestrated by elements within the Indian government.
鈥淭hat is complete nonsense,鈥� said Garry Keller, who served as chief of staff to interim Conservative leader Rona Ambrose.
Ahmad said the PMO never tried to advance such a theory.
鈥淚t is false what people have alleged, that this was somehow politically driven,鈥� he said.
The anonymous official who briefed journalists was 鈥渟omeone who is familiar with security protocols and national security in the Canadian government鈥� and who provides independent advice, said Ahmad.
鈥� With files from Mike Blanchfield in Ottawa
Amy Smart and Gemma Karstens-Smith, The Canadian Press
Like us on and follow us on .
