The Liberal government has clarified how its new policy on reproductive rights will apply to organizations seeking youth summer job funding 鈥� but it鈥檚 standing firm on its decision to deny grants to groups advocating against abortion.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not about beliefs or values,鈥� Employment Minister Patty Hajdu said Tuesday in Toronto.

Employment and Social Development Canada, which oversees the Canada Summer Jobs program that created nearly 69,000 temporary jobs last year, added a section on its website Tuesday further explaining the language 鈥� and the intended goal 鈥� of the controversial new requirement.

The Liberals have said that faith-based organizations are welcome to apply, but they and all other applicants must attest to their respect for sexual and reproductive rights 鈥� including 鈥渢he right to access safe and legal abortions鈥� 鈥� as well as other human rights in order to be considered.

That stipulation, as outlined in the application guidelines, concerns both the job activity and the core mandate of the organization.

Many churches and other religious groups have said that forces them to choose between their spiritual values and funding that helps run programs that have nothing to do with abortion, treading upon fundamental freedoms of conscience, religion and thought guaranteed by the charter.

Even Liberal MP Scott Simms had spoken out against the requirement, telling CBC Radio on Monday that groups were being asked 鈥渢o do something that they shouldn鈥檛 be asked to do for the sake of a summer job for kids.鈥�

The change to the website is meant to address those concerns.

The core mandate, the website says, refers to 鈥渢he primary activities undertaken by the organization that reflect the organization鈥檚 ongoing services provided to the community,鈥� and not its beliefs or values.

The website then also provides some hypothetical examples of what would 鈥� and would not 鈥� be eligible for funding.

What would get a green light?

鈥淎 faith-based organization that embraces a traditional definition of marriage but whose primary activities reduce social isolation among seniors applies for funding to hire students,鈥� website said, noting the programs the student employees developed would be available to all seniors, no matter their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.

A summer camp that does not allow LGBTQ youth, however, would not be eligible for funding to hire students as camp counsellors.

Julia Beazley, director of public policy at the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, said she welcomed the explanation and thinks it could help some groups figure out whether they should go ahead and submit their applications.

Still, she said discomfort remains with the government being the one to define those terms.

鈥淎s faith-based organizations, we are defined by our beliefs, by core values, by missions,鈥� she said, 鈥渟o, while a core mandate may delineate activities, it flows out of those beliefs and values and identities.鈥�

The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement Tuesday saying they remain unsatisfied.

鈥淭he attestation and examples still amount to the government鈥檚 coercion on matters of conscience and religious belief,鈥� spokesman Rene Laprise said in an email. 鈥淭hey foreclose the possibility of wide-ranging views and even healthy disagreement. The attestation remains unacceptable.鈥�

Hajdu said the Liberal government is nonetheless prepared to defend its decision against legal challenges.

She said the government made the changes after receiving complaints last year that summer job funding had been given to groups that distribute graphic anti-abortion pamphlets and summer jobs that refuse to hire LGBTQ staff.

鈥淲e took those complaints seriously and this is the decision that we鈥檝e taken, that in order for organizations to receive funding they have to affirm that they will not work to undermine the rights of Canadians,鈥� said Hajdu.

Andrew Bennett, the law program director at Cardus, a public policy think thank, noted that distributing graphic anti-abortion pamphlets, however 鈥渄istasteful鈥� many people might find them to be, is not against the law.

鈥淧eople are going to disagree vehemently on issues, but that鈥檚 what it means to live in a democracy,鈥� said Bennett, a Christian theologian who previously served as the federal ambassador for religious freedoms.

鈥淭he government has a particular responsibility to ensure those fundamental freedoms are guaranteed and protected,鈥� he said.

Joyce Arthur, executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, said she was glad to see the Liberals clarify the wording.

Her national political advocacy organization, which had urged the Liberals to bar funding to groups advocating against abortion rights, had been concerned the vague language was at the heart of the backlash.

鈥淚 think that if a group still feels that they cannot sign the attestation even with these clarifications, well, I guess they are ineligible for funding,鈥� said Arthur.

Joanna Smith, The Canadian Press

Like us on and follow us on .