After years of experiencing hate for expressing themselves through the art of drag, the Okanagan鈥檚 鈥榮torytime Queen鈥� has seen a glimmer of hope coming from the Superior Courts of Ontario.

On Dec. 14, Justice Tracey Nieckarz made a decision to move forward with the defamation suit of where a man was accused of calling an Ontario-based drag performer a 鈥済roomer.鈥�

In the decision, Nieckarz dismissed the defendant鈥檚 claims that he was exercising freedom of expression and ruled that the term 鈥済roomer鈥� is an anti-2SLGBTQIA+ slur.

Kelowna鈥檚 Tyson Cook, a 2SLGBTQIA+ advocate who is also known as said he was happy to hear that the slur does not fall under Canada鈥檚 protected speech laws.

Cook explained he has been called several anti-2SLGBTQIA+ slurs, including the term 鈥済roomer,鈥� in relation to his work at drag story times, which he explained are fun and age-appropriate events to promote a love of reading in a safe, inclusive and welcoming space for all people.

鈥淎s the story time queen of the Okanagan, I鈥檝e definitely had some slurs and lies spouted about me. These are not only hurtful and derogatory but they are also outright lies,鈥� Cook said.

While dressed up in exaggerated, colourful clothing and makeup as their drag persona Whales, Cook regularly performs in both bars with adult-centered content and libraries full of families.

Over the past few years, Cook and many other drag performers, have unduly and slurs both online and fromwhere drag events are taking place.

READ MORE:

READ MORE:

In the Ontario case, the defendant, Brian Webster, is facing a lawsuit for defamation after allegedly calling an Ontario-based drag performer named Caitlin Hartlen a 鈥済roomer鈥� in a Facebook post.

Webster applied to have the lawsuit dismissed, alleging that the suit violates his rights to 鈥榮trategic litigation against public participation鈥� (SLAPP).

In Canada, the purpose of anti-SLAPP legislation is to encourage people to freely express themselves on matters of public interest.

However, on Dec. 14, Nieckarz ruled that while freedom of expression is a fundamental right and value it is 鈥渘ot a 鈥榗arte blanche鈥� to defame.鈥�

READ MORE:

Nieckarz said having freedom of expression does not mean that a person has a licence to ruin reputations or make unjustified assaults on a person鈥檚 character.

She said that 鈥渢here appears to be no factual basis for the allegation that Hartlen and the other performers are 鈥榞roomers鈥�.鈥�

Nieckarz said the term reinforces stigma and misinformation, is not a 鈥渇air comment鈥� and is not related to a matter of public interest, and therefore, is not protected under anti-SLAPP legislation.

The defamation lawsuit will proceed in the Ontario Superior Courts over the coming months.

In light of the Ontario decision, Cook is looking forward to continuing to spread a love of reading throughout the Okanagan as ,

He said that he is hopeful and excited to see how the court鈥檚 decision will impact the hateful comments that he and other performers receive in the future.