Oak Bay resident Stefan Dollinger always loved languages. He spent hours and hours in the depths of the Vienna University Library, studying the origins of modern language, and more specifically, English.
In early 2000 though, the Austrian-born lexicographer and University of British Columbia English department professor stumbled on what seemed to be a bible 鈥� or more so a linguistic map 鈥� of the Canadian language: the Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles (DCHP) circa 1967.
鈥淟ots of people who are in languages and literature, they don鈥檛 really know about it yet,鈥� said Dollinger, adding that as it happened, he was also writing his PhD dissertation on early Ontario English, (ironically not on lexicons). It wasn鈥檛 until 2005 conference in Toronto when the idea of someone revising DCHP surfaced.
Dollinger eagerly stepped in, and Nelson, DCHP鈥檚 original publisher, approached him for what would take nearly a decade, $300,000 and 43 talented students to create what is now . And, unlike online sources telling the origins of Canadianisms, Dollinger and his team鈥檚 approach is meticulously processed.
鈥淭here are lots of lists online that talks about Canadianisms, Canadian words and meanings, but they鈥檙e not very good鈥� this has been a scientific approach towards geographical variation in English,鈥� he said.
They didn鈥檛 just look at Canadian sources, either, but at American and British, New Zealand and Australian language pools for reference. Dollinger added 1,002 new head words and roughly 1,300 new meanings, with a total of around 11,000 head words and 14,500 meanings. The first 鈥�67 edition of DCHP was also digitized for easier access.
DCHP is not necessarily for immigrants and newcomers either, but a lingual source rich with history.
鈥淚t鈥檚 mostly for Canadians who really need authoritative information about what it is that makes their English special,鈥� Dollinger said. 鈥淲e did a tenth of what the original team did, but when you look at the new entries, they are 10 times as long than the old ones.鈥�
There are some revealing, if not startling, entries. For example, the term originates from the Hawaiian kanaka 鈥榤an鈥� and was used in discriminatory and racist contexts, as well as describing a French-Canadian individual. Canuck took a lighter meaning in 1945, when a Vancouver hockey team, the , was formed, and remains today as the most frequent use of the word.
Still, the reality is that language, and indeed Canadian English, is constantly evolving.
鈥淚t鈥檚 just logical development of linguistics and the way people speak,鈥� Dollinger said, adding each community develops its own linguistic features and cultures. 鈥淚n the old European context, the longer a particular area has been there, the more diverse it is in terms of dialect. In the last two or three centuries, that has been counterbalanced by the influence of standard languages.鈥�
The project doesn鈥檛 stop here, either. Dollinger is planning on a possible DCHP-3, and mulling to maybe fundraise a print edition of DCHP-2. This year, he will work with University of Victoria鈥檚 archives of the first-edition of the English dictionary to compile a book on the making of Canadian English.
