Hordes of protesters shouted to be allowed inside the Ontario legislature as provincial politicians held a rare midnight sitting to speed up the passage of a controversial bill to cut Toronto鈥檚 city council nearly in half.
Protesters voiced their opposition to the bill inside Queen鈥檚 Park as well, heckling Progressive Conservative legislators with cries of 鈥渟hame, shame鈥� until the Speaker cleared the public galleries.
People who had lined up to observe the overnight debate expressed their outrage at being shut out of the process, chanting 鈥淟et us in!鈥� and 鈥淥ur city, not Ford鈥檚!鈥� as police officers stood in front of the doors. The commotion could be heard from inside the house at times, and some protesters lingered into the early morning hours.
NDP Leader Andrea Horwath briefly left the debate to address the crowd, telling them she was proud to see so many people rally to defend charter rights at such an unusual time.
She pledged to keep fighting the Progressive Conservative government鈥檚 decision to push through the legislation 鈥� a message she later repeated to the assembled legislators.
鈥淚nterfering in ongoing elections has鈥 chilling effect on our democracy,鈥� she said inside the house.
鈥淭he reality is this government behaved inappropriately, rammed this change forward without any kind of consultation while the elections were already underway.鈥�
The Ontario government, meanwhile, cited the need for urgent action in justifying the late-night sitting, saying passing the bill 鈥� which would reduce council to 25 seats from 47 鈥� would eliminate any uncertainty surrounding the upcoming municipal vote.
鈥淲ith the date of the municipal election rapidly approaching, we need to take action,鈥� Municipal Affairs Minister Steve Clark said. 鈥漁ct. 22 is just a few weeks away. Action to provide greater certainty for everyone and action to ensure that the election proceeds.鈥�
An earlier version of the bill was struck down as unconstitutional by an Ontario Superior Court judge last Monday, prompting Premier Doug Ford to invoke a rare provision known as the notwithstanding clause to override the ruling and reintroduce the legislation.
Ford鈥檚 use of the provision has been denounced by the opposition parties, prominent Canadian politicians and hundreds of legal professionals.
鈥淭he premier鈥檚 use of the notwithstanding clause for the first time has created unprecedented chaos in our city, in our province and beyond,鈥� Liberal legislator Mitzie Hunter said during the debate.
Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said the premier鈥檚 actions have put the municipal election in jeopardy.
鈥淭his premier has manufactured a crisis by meddling with elections and trampling on local democracy,鈥� he said in a statement. 鈥淭he Conservatives are acting with impunity, trying to suspend people鈥檚 Charter rights under the cover of darkness while Ontarians are asleep. 鈥�
The Tory government maintains the move is necessary and within its rights, and claims the judge made an error in his ruling.
鈥淭his is something that we have a constitutional right to do and we believe it鈥檚 important for elected representatives to be making the law,鈥� Deputy Premier Christine Elliott said outside the legislature.
Evangeline Cowie and Ana Buzdugan, two Grade 12 students from Toronto, watched the debate for a short time before the public galleries were cleared. The pair said they felt it was important to show their opposition to the bill 鈥� even on a school night.
鈥淚t鈥檚 going to send a message that everyone is ready, is prepared to do whatever it takes to go against that decision,鈥� said Cowie, who attended with her parents.
鈥淗istory is kind of going to be made today so I feel like it鈥檚 important to be here, especially for something that concerns Toronto and its citizens so much,鈥� Buzdugan added.
鈥淢y dad found it kind of unusual that I wanted to come, he asked me why I couldn鈥檛 just watch it on TV and I was like, 鈥楴o it鈥檚 different when you鈥檙e actually there because it feels like it鈥檚 something you鈥檙e a part of.鈥欌��
Related:
Related:
Frank Griggs, who lined up to observe the proceedings, expressed similar motivations.
鈥淚 hope this sends a message to some of the Conservative MPPs that might at least consider voting against this bill based on the feelings of their own constituents and also just their own sense of decency and their own idea of what democracy should be,鈥� Griggs said.
The bill was debated at an uncommon weekend sitting at Queen鈥檚 Park on Saturday, and the lieutenant-governor granted the government鈥檚 request to reconvene the house at 12:01 a.m. Monday to continue the debate.
Ford wouldn鈥檛 say how much it cost to bring back staff on the weekend, but laid the blame with the Opposition for delaying the bill鈥檚 passing.
New Democrats had argued the bill should be thrown out, citing rules that preclude the house from debating substantially identical legislation in the same session and from debating a matter that is before the courts.
However, Speaker Ted Arnott ruled in the government鈥檚 favour early Monday morning, saying the newly introduced bill is different from its previous incarnation.
The NDP also moved to adjourn the overnight debate but lost 67-24.
The government finds itself crunched for time at the legislature with the International Plowing Match in Chatham-Kent set for Tuesday and each year Queen鈥檚 Park closes for a day so all politicians can attend.
Earlier this week, City of Toronto clerk Ulli Watkiss said that with each passing day it becomes 鈥渧irtually impossible鈥� to ensure the city provides its residents and candidates with a fair election.
Paola Loriggio, The Canadian Press
Like us on and follow us on .
