The Latest on Britain鈥檚 royal wedding between Prince Harry and Meghan Markle on Saturday:
Meghan Markle鈥檚 father may have changed his mind and hopes to attend the royal wedding after all.
The website TMZ quotes Thomas Markle as saying he now wants to come to the wedding Saturday in Windsor, if doctors allow it.
The retired television cinematographer had been due to walk his daughter down the aisle at Windsor Castle鈥檚 St. George鈥檚 Chapel on Saturday.
On Monday, TMZ reported that the elder Markle has decided to stay away amid criticism over his decision to pose for mocked up wedding-preparation shots taken by a paparazzi agency.
Thomas Markle also said he suffered a heart attack last week.
On Tuesday TMZ quoted him as saying 鈥淚 hate the idea of missing one of the greatest moments in history and walking my daughter down the aisle.鈥� But he also reportedly said doctors are still performing tests and he is not sure whether he will be released from the hospital in time for Saturday鈥檚 wedding.
Samantha Markle told Good Morning Britain on Tuesday that Thomas Markle panicked while driving on the highway because he was being followed by numerous press cars.
Thomas Markle is not the first person to be bruised in the collision between Britain鈥檚 royal family and the media 鈥� a relationship that is deep, complex and sometimes toxic.
鈥淚t is a symbiotic and parasitic relationship which is harmful to both sides,鈥� said Graham Smith of anti-monarchy group Republic, who is resolutely unaffected by royal wedding fever. 鈥淐ertainly harmful to the British public in terms of the way in which we are fed this hype and nonsense 鈥� and clearly harmful to the family.鈥�
For centuries, Britain鈥檚 royal dramas played out at a distance from the public, as a deferential media protected the secrets of the monarchy. In the 1930s, the romance between King Edward VIII and divorced American Wallis Simpson was headline news in the U.S. press, but barely mentioned in Britain until the king abdicated, forced to choose between the crown and the woman he loved.
That changed by the time Prince Charles married 20-year-old Lady Diana Spencer in 1981 in a ceremony watched by hundreds of millions of people around the world. The media charted every twist in the saga that followed: the births of sons William and Harry, Diana鈥檚 glamour and charity work, and her evident and growing unhappiness in the marriage.
WATCH: A History of British Royal Wedding Dresses
Charles and Diana both used the media as a weapon as their marriage foundered, giving TV interviews to present themselves in a sympathetic light. It was ratings gold, reaching a peak when Diana told an interviewer that 鈥渢here were three of us鈥� in the marriage 鈥� Diana, Charles and his then-paramour Camilla Parker Bowles, who is now Charles鈥� wife.
鈥淒iana turned the royal family inside out,鈥� said Ellis Cashmore, honorary professor of sociology at Aston University and author of books on celebrity culture. 鈥淎ll the dirty secrets had come into the public domain.鈥�
Diana became the most famous woman on Earth, trailed by paparazzi wherever she went 鈥� including to her death. She was killed in a Paris car crash in 1997 while being pursued by photographers.
Diana鈥檚 death provoked a crisis for the monarchy 鈥� which was portrayed as remote and cold at a time of national grief 鈥� and for the media, accused of hounding a vulnerable woman.
In the years that followed, palace and press reached an uneasy truce. The royal family made concessions to popular interests, including carefully staged interviews and photo opportunities with William and Harry as they grew up. That practice has continued with the three young children of William and his wife Kate.
But Diana鈥檚 sons retain a deeply ingrained mistrust of the media.
鈥淗arry鈥檚 attitude towards the press is he doesn鈥檛 like the press,鈥� former Sun newspaper royal editor Duncan Larcombe, author of 鈥淧rince Harry: The Inside Story,鈥� told Town & Country magazine. 鈥淚n Harry鈥檚 mind, it was the press that killed his mother.鈥�
When Harry and Markle decided to make their relationship public, the prince fired a broadside at the media, saying that the biracial Markle had faced 鈥渁 wave of abuse and harassment,鈥� including 鈥渞acial undertones鈥� in comment articles.
鈥淭his is not a game 鈥� it is her life and his,鈥� said the statement from Harry鈥檚 press secretary.
Still, Markle鈥檚 media experience, gained during her career as an actress, has been evident from the start. At the couple鈥檚 televised engagement interview she appeared relaxed, confident and happy. It was a far cry from a 1981 interview with shy Diana and awkward Charles, who replied 鈥渨hatever love means鈥� when asked if he was in love.
Saturday鈥檚 wedding is expected to draw more than 5,000 media staff and 79 television networks from around the world to Windsor. American and international TV networks plan hours of live coverage.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 think anything can quite prepare her,鈥� Cashmore said 鈥� though as 鈥渁n independent-minded woman, brimming with confidence,鈥� Markle is well equipped to deal with intense media interest that is unlikely to fade.
鈥淭he media are the public鈥檚 proxy,鈥� Cashmore said. 鈥淭he reason they go for these stories that are ever more intrusive is that we want it.鈥�
The Associated Press
Like us on and follow us on .
