亚洲天堂

Skip to content

Twitter鈥檚 blue check: Vital verification or status symbol?

Elon Musk wants to turn this verification system into a revenue source for the company
30911517_web1_20221103131136-6363fccf821cf083b81dfbf1jpeg
FILE - The Twitter page of Elon Musk is seen on the screen of a computer in Sausalito, Calif., on Monday, April 25, 2022. Elon Musk wants to change how Twitter doles out its checkmark badges for verified accounts. While the 鈥渂lue check鈥 is at times viewed as an elite status symbol for the rich and famous, its purpose has always been to ensure that the people and accounts tweeting are who they say they are. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)

The story of Twitter鈥檚 blue checkmarks 鈥 a simple verification system that鈥檚 come to be viewed as an elite status symbol 鈥 began with some high-profile impersonations, just as the site began taking off in 2008 and 鈥09.

Celebrities who saw their likeness spoofed included Kanye West, now Ye, the basketball star and the actor , who was also impersonated on a wildly popular website called 鈥 MySpace.

Then, in June 2009, St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa , claiming that a fake account, using his name to make light of drunken driving and two Cardinals pitchers who died, damaged his reputation and caused emotional distress.

LaRussa eventually . But in June of that year, Twitter鈥檚 then-CEO Biz Stone to sort out authentic accounts from impostors. The benefit would be to the holders of the accounts, but also to everyone else on Twitter. They could be sure, if they saw the blue check next to a name, that what they were reading was authentic.

Fast-forward to 2022. Twitter鈥檚 , billionaire Elon Musk, wants to turn this verification system into a revenue source for the company he paid $44 billion to purchase. It鈥檚 a 180-degree turn from the stance he took , when he said he wanted to 鈥渧erify all humans鈥 on Twitter.

After floating the idea of charging users $20 a month for the 鈥渂lue check鈥 and some extra features, he appeared to quickly scale it back in a Twitter exchange with author Stephen King, who posted 鈥淚f that gets instituted, I鈥檓 gone like Enron.鈥

鈥淲e need to pay the bills somehow! Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How about $8?鈥 Musk replied.

Whatever the price, the idea of a paid verification system is raising some complex questions and concerns 鈥 beyond the customary cheers and jeers that have accompanied Musk鈥檚 every move since he took ownership of the social media company last week.

鈥淭apping into Twitter users to make more money may be the right strategy, but verification isn鈥檛 the right feature to charge for,鈥 said Insider Intelligence analyst Jasmine Enberg. 鈥淰erification is intended to ensure the integrity of accounts and conversations on the platform, rather than a premium feature meant to elevate the experience. There is a growing appetite among some social users to pay for features that add value to their experiences.鈥

Instead of charging for authentication, though, Enberg said Musk should be looking at adding features to Twitter that get people to use it more and help them grow their follower base and find a way to make money from those.

鈥淭urning users into customers isn鈥檛 an easy sell, and the value exchange has to be right in order for it to pay off,鈥 she said.

Twitter already has a subscription plan, Twitter Blue, that for $5 a month lets users access extra features, such as the ability to undo a tweet and read ad-free articles. Musk鈥檚 plan, as it appears from his tweets, seems to be expanding it to charge more money for more features 鈥 including the verification badge 鈥 and spread it to more users.

鈥淥f roughly 300,000 verified accounts on Twitter we would estimate only about 25% would go down this path ultimately and pay the $8 per month fee,鈥 Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives said.

That would mean only $7.2 million a year in extra revenue for Twitter 鈥 not enough to move the dial for a company whose last was $1.18 billion.

Ives expects Musk to first go after users who already have the check to charge them to keep it, then likely introduce other tiered pricing plans for other accounts.

鈥淭he problem is with many athletes and celebrities willing to lose their coveted blue check and refusing to pay the monthly fee it would be an ominous black eye moment for Musk on his first strategic move with Twitter,鈥 he said.

While Musk鈥檚 exact plans are not clear, experts are raising concerns about the consequences of having a paid verification system that leaves anyone unwilling to pay vulnerable to impersonation 鈥 and anyone who does pay the ability to have their Twitter presence boosted by the platform鈥檚 algorithms.

While many verified users on Twitter are famous, there are also community activists, journalists at small newspapers and outlets inside and outside of the U.S. 鈥 and regular people who simply find themselves in the news. For this subset, $8 a month may not be worth it, no matter how many memes about the cost of a cup of coffee.

The idea behind verification 鈥 which other social networks later copied 鈥 was to ensure that public figures, politicians and businesses were who they say they are. It began small at first, as things do when tech companies test out new features and functions.

鈥淭he experiment will begin with public officials, public agencies, famous artists, athletes, and other well known individuals at risk of impersonation,鈥 Stone wrote in 2009. He suggested that those who can鈥檛 be immediately verified put their official website in their Twitter bio to show that they are who they say they are.

Business accounts 鈥 such as brand pages for Coca-Cola or McDonald鈥檚 鈥 were not included in the initial verification system, nor were rank-and-file journalists. Those were added later, as misinformation from fake sites and accounts became a bigger problem on social media.

While the 鈥渂lue check鈥 (which is actually a white checkmark in a blue frame, or black checkmark in a white frame if you are using Twitter in dark mode) has come to be viewed in some circles as an elite status symbol for the rich and famous, its purpose has always been to ensure that the people and accounts tweeting are who they say they are. As such, it benefited Twitter as much 鈥 if not more 鈥 as it benefitted the accounts that were verified, by clamping down on impersonations.

Kelly McBride, an expert on journalism ethics for the Poynter Institute think tank, said she suspected the blue check would become less valuable if people know that it could be bought. Currently, it signifies a person with a particular position or public stature whose identity has been verified.

鈥淭witter may end up being a similar story,鈥 she said. 鈥淚t may become less valuable to journalists. And that wouldn鈥檛 be a bad thing.鈥

鈥擝arbara Ortutay, The Associated Press





(or

亚洲天堂

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }
Pop-up banner image