The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed an appeal by the Ktunaxa Nation who were arguing that their religious rights were infringed when the BC government approved a development plan for a ski resort on a glacier west of Invermere.
The Ktunaxa, who previously took their case to the BC Supreme Court and the BC Appeals Court, argued they were not adequately consulted by the BC government when it approved a development plan for a ski resort the Jumbo Glacier Valley.
All nine justices agreed that the provincial government had adequately consulted the Ktunaxa, however, two justices also noted that religious Indigenous would be infringed by the construction of a ski resort in spiritually sensitive land.
The area around the proposed ski resort, known as Qat鈥檓uk, carries significant religious meaning as it is home to the Grizzly Bear spirit, which is a source of spiritual strength for the Ktunaxa.
鈥淲hile the goal of the process is reconciliation of the Aboriginal and state interest, in some cases this may not be possible. The process is one of 鈥榞ive and take鈥�, and outcomes are not guaranteed,鈥� wrote Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin and Justice Malcolm Rowe, in joint reasons on behalf of seven justices.
Kathryn Teneese, the chair of the Ktunaxa Nation Council, said her people will continue to work on implementing the Qat鈥檓uk Declaration, which seeks to work with provincial and federal governments to establish an Indigenous Protection Area around the area.
鈥淲e feel that our resolve is unchanged, that we will continue to move down that path,鈥� said Teneese.
While all nine justices concluded that the BC government adequately consulted with the Ktunaxa during the resort development planning process, Justice Michael Moldaver and Suzanne C么t茅 argued that their religious rights under Section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms would be infringed.
鈥淭he development of the ski resort would desecrate Qat鈥檓uk and cause Grizzly Bear Spirit to leave, thus severing the Ktunaxa鈥檚 connection to the land,鈥� wrote Moldaver.
鈥淎s a result, the Ktunaxa would no longer receive spiritual guidance and assistance from Grizzly Bear Spirit. All songs, rituals, and ceremonies associated with Grizzly Bear Spirit would become meaningless.鈥�
However, both Justices Moldaver and C么t茅 agreed with the rest of the Supreme Court bench that the BC government, specifically Minister Steve Thomson of Forests, Lands and Natural Resources at the time, appropriately balanced the Ktunaxa religious rights with the government鈥檚 obligation to administer Crown land.
鈥淭he Minister was faced with two options: approve the development of the ski resort or grant the Ktunaxa a right to exclude others from constructing permanent structures on over fifty square kilometres of Crown land,鈥� wrote Moldaver and C么t茅. 鈥淭his placed the Minister in a difficult, if not impossible, position. If he granted this right of exclusion to the Ktunaxa, this would significantly hamper, if not prevent him, from fulfilling his statutory objectives. In the end, it is apparent that he determined that the fulfillment of his statutory mandate prevented him from giving the Ktunaxa the veto right that they were seeking.鈥�
While Justices Moldaver and C么t茅 agreed with the central question that the Ktunaxa had been adequately consulted by the BC government, their conclusion that spiritual rights had been infringed is another step forward in recognizing Indigenous religious freedoms, said Teneese.
鈥淭hat means that at least two out of the nine heard some of the message that we were bringing forward,鈥� she said, 鈥渁nd while it didn鈥檛 help in terms of the overall decision, we believe those were helpful for the beginning of building on the people鈥檚 understanding 鈥� all people鈥檚 understanding 鈥� of who we are as Ktunaxa people and as Indigenous people in this country.鈥�
Teneese also said she was disappointed that the ruling did not seem to consider positions based on the United Nations Declaration of the Indigenous Peoples, which the Ktunaxa had made reference to in their submissions to the court.
鈥淲e felt it was timely due to Canada鈥檚 position around that issue as well as the government of British Columbia,鈥� she said. 鈥淪o it was a little disappointing that a tool that was made available wasn鈥檛 given more consideration as the court made its decision.鈥�
Teneese added that in order to fully address reconciliation, it is up to individuals, governments and Indigenous peoples to work together towards solutions that are mutually beneficial to everyone.
Wildsight, an organization dedicated to wildlife and biodiversity conservation efforts in the Kootenay region, said it was disappointed by the Supreme Court ruling.
The organization says it stands with the Ktunaxa Nation in their continued fight to protect spiritually-sensitive territory from development in the Jumbo region, pointing to public support for keeping the area untouched.
鈥淭he strong local support has not waned; there鈥檚 huge public support to keep Jumbo wild,鈥� said Robyn Duncan, the executive director of Wildsight. 鈥淭he BC NDP and BC Green Party have taken strong public stances against the Jumbo Glacier Resort in the past.
鈥淭he Federal government continues to speak about their commitment to reconciliation with First Nations and the Canada Target 1 initiative, that鈥檚 looking at protecting 17 per cent of Canada鈥檚 landscape by the year 2020, I think we鈥檙e seeing all of these pieces coming into place and we have a real opportunity to take a step forward and support the Ktunaxa in their call to establish an Indigenous protected area in the Jumbo Valley.
While the Jumbo area is known as the home of the grizzly bear spirit to the Ktunaxa, it is a crucial habitat for wildlife such as the grizzly bear, wolverines and other animals that can be found in the Purcell Mountains.
The Supreme Court ruling does not mean the resort will be built.
The proposed development is currently stalled, after an Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC) expired in 2015 because not enough work had been completed at the site, as former Environment Minister Mary Polak determined the project had not been 鈥檚ubstantially started鈥� in 2015.
Without the EAC, the proponents 鈥� Glacier Resorts Ltd 鈥� cannot do any construction as detailed in their Master Development Plan that was approved by the province in 2012.
Glacier Resorts Ltd has applied for a judicial review of the substantially started decision rendered by Polak, which is currently winding through the BC Supreme Court system.
Timeline
鈥� March 1991 - Formal Proposal submitted to the Province.
鈥� March 1993 - Interim Agreement, granting sole proponent status, is signed by the Province and the proponent, following advertising to determine if there was any competing interest.
鈥� 1992 - Nov. 1994 - Review under Commission on Resource and Environment (CORE) land use process. This resulted in a designation for the Jumbo area which supported commercial tourism and resort development use, subject to such development being capable of mitigating potential environmental impacts.
鈥� July 1995 - October 2004 - Environmental Assessment Act review - Environmental Assessment Certificate granted, with 195 conditions.
鈥� October 2005 - Judicial review of the Environmental Assessment Office process. The court upholds the Environmental Assessment Certificate.
鈥� 2006 - Provincial review of the draft Resort Master Plan under the All Seasons Resort Policy.
鈥� 2006 - Consultation continued under the All Seasons Resort Policy, with commitment to Ktunaxa Nation that a Master Development Agreement would not be concluded with the proponent until consultation was completed.
鈥� July 2007 - Resort Master Plan approved by the Province.
鈥� 2008 - The proponent and the Shuswap Indian Band developed an Impact Management and Benefits Agreement, subject to project approval.
鈥� 2009 - Environmental Assessment Certificate received a one-time, five-year extension.
鈥� June 2009 -The Province advised the Ktunaxa that the consultation process, as per the agreement between Ktunaxa and the Province, was complete. Ktunaxa advised the ministry of its spiritual interest in the Jumbo area. The Province agreed to consider the new information. Consultation continued.
鈥� October 2010 - The Ktunaxa signed a Strategic Engagement Agreement with the Province, and received a Treaty Land and Cash Offer.
鈥� November 15, 2010 - Ktunaxa presented their Qat鈥檓uk Declaration to the Province at the Parliament Buildings in Victoria.
鈥� Summer 2011 - Thomson visited the proposed site and met with the Shuswap, the Ktunaxa and the proponent.
鈥� March 2012 -Thomson approves the Master Development Agreement for Jumbo Glacier Resort under the Land Act and the Ministry of Lands, Parks and Housing Act.
